COURSE NOTES: Personality
Chapter 12:
Mischel & Bandura
Based on the following textbook, with supplements and modifications by the author:
Cloninger, S. (2004). Theories of Personality: Understanding Persons (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NY: Prentice Hall.
Instructors who have adopted this text may obtain supplementary Powerpoint presentations from the publisher.
denotes a term that you should know how to define, and to recognize and give examples.
denotes an important person. You should remember this person's name and what (s)he has done.
denotes an important research finding.
denotes an issue that you should be able to discuss or explain. |
Chapter 12:
Mischel and Bandura: Cognitive Social Learning Theory
Traits in Cognitive Social Learning Theory: Mischel
The Trait Controversy: Mischel's Challenge
personality coefficient
- (r = .30)
- average relationship between self-report personality measures and behavior
- little consistency across situations
- (greater temporal consistency)
The Consistency Paradox
- discrepancy between intuition and empirical findings
- common sense (intuition): consistency
research evidence (empirical): little consistency
The Situational Context of Behavior
situational hedges: "Person does x when y."
"Johnny will hit back [behavior] when teased [situational hedge]."
Imagine combinations of these behaviors:
- hit
- cry
- smile
- With any of these situations:
- ... when pushed.
- ... when teased.
- ... when complimented
- Some combinations make sense; others are bizarre (and observers may consider them “psychotic”).
- Meaningful combinations are consistent for various normal personality traits:
- aggressive
- friendly
- withdrawn
Illustration of a Dispositional Construct (Shyness) as an If-Then Linkage between a Category of Conditions and a Category of Behaviors [See Figure 12.1 in the Cloninger text on page 357.]
Cognitive Person Variables
Encoding Strategies and Personal Constructs
personal constructs: trait terms people use to describe themselves and other people
prototypes: typical exemplars of "fuzzy" categories
situational descriptions
descriptions of events
(must assess individual meanings of stimuli)
Competencies
Examples of Cognitive and Behavioral Construction Competencies:
- Sexual gender identity
- Knowing structure of the physical world
- Social rules and conventions
- Personal constructs about self, others
- Rehearsal strategies for learning
Expectancies
Behavior-Outcome Expectancies
- If I study 3 hours, will I get an A ?
- If I run, will I catch the bus?
Stimulus-Outcome Expectancies
Self-Efficacy Expectancies
Subjective Stimulus Values
desirability of outcomes (given the particular individual’s goals or values)
Self-Regulatory Systems and Plans
Delay of Gratification
Mischel's research with children
- visibility of reward
- thinking about something else
- modeling
Preschool Children Who are Better Able to Delay of Gratification Become High Schoolers Who:
- are attentive and can concentrate
- can put their ideas into words
- are reasonable
- keep calm
- deal with stress maturely
Delay of gratification is a core "ego strength"
- predicts cognitive & social competence later
Performance in Cognitive Social Learning Theory: Bandura
Reciprocal Determinism
mutual influences of
- B: behavior
- P: person
- E: environment
Self-Regulation of Behavior: The Self-System
[See Figure 12.3 in the Cloninger text on page 366]
self-observation (of performance)
judgmental process (standards)
self-response (e.g., rewards)
Self-Efficacy
Efficacy and Striving Toward Goals
Physiological Correlates of Efficacy
Processes Influencing Learning
Attentional Processes: Observing the Behavior
Model: distinctive, affective valence, complexity, prevalence, functional value
Observer: sensory capacities, arousal level, motivation, perceptual set, past reinforcement
Retention Processes: Remembering It
symbolic coding, cognitive organization, symbolic rehearsal, motor rehearsal
Motor Reproduction Processes: Doing It
physical capabilities, availability of component responses, self-observation of reproductions, accuracy feedback
Motivational Processes: Wanting It
external reinforcement, vicarious reinforcement, self-reinforcement
Observational Learning and Modeling
Learning may occur without reinforcement.
vicarious learning
identification
- modeling
- power vs. status effects
standards for behavior
Modeling of Self-Reinforcement
With superior models, young boys demand better performance of themselves on a bowling task before rewarding themselves.
Modeling of Aggression
- Filmed models
- Learning is not always evident in performance.
Both boys and girls imitate aggression more often if the aggressive model is rewarded than if the model is punished. Regardless of condition, boys are (on average) more aggressive than girls.
Modeling also occurs in adulthood.
Therapy
use learning principles
self-efficacy
treatment of phobias, etc.
varies with behavioral domain
High self-efficacy leads to persistence toward our goals.
Efficacy expectations and outcome expectations. [graphic presented in lecture]
Changing Efficacy Expectations Through Therapy
- Performance accomplishments
- Vicarious experience
- Verbal persuasion
- Emotional arousal
PERFORMANCE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
- MODE OF INDUCTION:
- participant modeling
- performance desensitization
- performance exposure
- self-instructed performance
VICARIOUS EXPERIENCE
- MODE OF INDUCTION
- live modeling
- symbolic modeling
VERBAL PERSUASION
- MODE OF INDUCTION:
- suggestion
- exhortation
- self-instruction
- interpretive treatments
EMOTIONAL AROUSAL
- MODE OF INDUCTION:
- attribution
- relaxation
- biofeedback
- symbolic desensitization
- symbolic exposure
Efficacy and Striving Toward Goals: The goals we set are important.
The Person in the Social Environment
Collective efficacy helps us achieve difficult goals together.
moral disengagement: failure to regulate one's behavior to live up to high moral standards
- cheating, because "everyone is doing it"
- being cruel, without thinking of individual responsibility
web links:
|
An interview with Albert Bandura:
|